← Jiryu Rutschman-Byler

I Don’t Know, And I Know

Jiryu Rutschman-Byler · 13 September 2026 · 51 min · San Francisco Zen Center

Given by Jiryu Rutschman-Byler at Green Gulch Farm on September 13th, 2026 Jiryu Rutschman-Byler discusses and appreciates Suzuki Roshi’s teaching that: “We should understand ourselves in two ways: as a particular person and as someone who has no name, no body, and no mind.”


Download audio

Automated transcript, estimated accuracy about 95% for this source; report an error.

Words the recogniser was unsure of are underlined with dots. Use “Report an error” beside any passage to tell us what the teacher actually says.

Key passages

The teacher's own words, quoted from the transcript below and chosen automatically as representative.

  • 3:59

    might think that to ground is to ground to connect with something that you know. But in Zen, the most grounded place we find is a place of not knowing. It's somehow the knowing is like complicated. It's where all the stuff lives, you know. So even if we do some good knowing, it's still, it's just in that ballpark of all that stuff. So the ground we enjoy and practice intimacy from is that ground of empty, open, not knowing.

  • 11:51

    So we talk in Buddhism, in Buddha Dharma, there's this teaching of the middle way, that we're always walking the middle way. In my study, I've been feeling more resonance with the view of the round way, the circle, the all-inclusive way, the way that totally includes these both sides of what we are. To not be confused by either. To not be that kind of wide-eyed, you know, we just got here and not able to kind of snap out of it, you know.

  • 13:18

    So there's a story we have in our tradition, maybe a story familiar to many of you, of a person who was insistent on that there is no past or future and that what this life is, that we just got here. And his name was Hyakujo, and he lived in the distant past, like maybe eons. or at least many centuries before another Hyakujo who lived in the Tang Dynasty in China and was a great ancestor of our way of Zen practice, Hyakujo or Baizhang.

  • 26:31

    And Bodhidharma said, I don't know. I think it's easy for me to...

  • 48:37

    The sound of the bird calls us deeper into zazen. The thing that's coming up is helping us. So one way that Suzuki Roshi talks about and that I've also been appreciating is like the background and the foreground. So he says that kind of unconstructed or big mind. It's like the background that things are arising in. So of course they're interdependent. You can't have the background without the foreground.

Transcript

0:00 This podcast is offered by the San Francisco Zen Center on the web at sfzc.org. Our public programs are made possible by donations from people like you. Report an error in the passage at 0:00

0:17 You know about meerkats? Report an error in the passage at 0:17

0:24 Yeah, my friend was supporting my posture and showed me some pictures of meerkats. Report an error in the passage at 0:24

0:34 looking up and out the whole body. Comes up naturally, looking for predators, no doubt. Report an error in the passage at 0:34

0:52 I don't know what it's like to be a meerkat. I don't know if they need to settle down sometimes. I Report an error in the passage at 0:52

1:01 know that I do. So maybe as we sit upright and open into the awe and wonder and aliveness of being here in this very still and quiet room this morning, to Report an error in the passage at 1:01

1:27 first settle into our bodies. Report an error in the passage at 1:27

1:36 Finding the breath in the belly, Report an error in the passage at 1:36

1:44 easing with the breath all the way out and all the way in from that low belly, as Report an error in the passage at 1:44

1:54 low as it wants, making Report an error in the passage at 1:54

2:06 room in the upper body to let the breath flow upright and open and relaxed so Report an error in the passage at 2:06

2:17 the breath is unimpeded as it goes all the way down to the root and Report an error in the passage at 2:17

2:26 all the way out from the root. Report an error in the passage at 2:26

2:41 Relaxing our body, we relax our heart too. Report an error in the passage at 2:41

2:47 And just let in the warmth, our Report an error in the passage at 2:47

2:54 natural tenderness and love for each other, for what's here, for this being, and Report an error in the passage at 2:54

3:11 letting go of whatever ideas we can let go of, whatever's in the mind, just letting it fall away. Report an error in the passage at 3:11

3:30 And then with open eyes and open ears and open pores, just receiving this being. Report an error in the passage at 3:30

3:41 Being upright and open and empty in all of this light and sound and sensation together. You Report an error in the passage at 3:41

3:59 might think that to ground is to ground to connect with something that you know. But in Zen, the most grounded place we find is a place of not knowing. Report an error in the passage at 3:59

4:15 It's somehow the knowing is like complicated. It's where all the stuff lives, you know. So even if we do some good knowing, it's still, it's just in that ballpark of all that stuff. So the ground we enjoy and practice intimacy from is that ground of empty, open, not knowing. Report an error in the passage at 4:15

4:41 Knowing comes and goes. There's no problem with the knowing. It's just not our ground. It's like the, it's just a flowing of light and sound, thought, sensation. Report an error in the passage at 4:41

5:02 So my name is Jiryu. I know many of you and some of you I don't know. Thank you very much for coming today and whether you're here in person on a beautiful day at Green Gulch or online having Report an error in the passage at 5:02

5:20 I don't know what kind of day. Anyway, I'm humbled and grateful for your turning your attention to the Dharma and you're trusting me to offer a few words of encouragement for our Report an error in the passage at 5:20

5:40 Life of Zen, as we call it here, or just life for short. I Report an error in the passage at 5:40

5:51 saw some people in robes earlier this morning. I thought, why do we do that? Report an error in the passage at 5:51

6:01 And then I remembered, it is something like grounding somewhere other than knowing. Report an error in the passage at 6:01

6:14 So anyway, there's a few things I want to try to talk about this morning, and I appreciate your openness, and we'll see if any of this lands for you. And hopefully have some time at the end to share, although I often go on. Report an error in the passage at 6:14

6:49 Many of you have heard me over the last several months appreciating this, appreciating time, time as a gate to opening and entering into the reality, the unconstructed reality of our life. And there's this phrase that I've been turning from our Soto Zen founder in Japan, Dogen Zenji. Report an error in the passage at 6:49

7:17 Who says the way, this moment, this aliveness now, this you being you as it is now, is not carried over from the past and it is not merely arising now. Some of you heard me reflect on this. Report an error in the passage at 7:17

7:46 The way has not, this being alive isn't at all stale. It doesn't, it hasn't gotten at all worn out from the past. It's not actually coming from the past. but it's also not just coming to be right now. Report an error in the passage at 7:46

8:03 So I've been really enjoying this teaching and really enjoying this question of Come on, Dogen, just give it to us straight here. Did it come from the past or is it just starting now? Report an error in the passage at 8:03

8:16 And I realized as I was thinking this over that this is a very funny thing I'm saying, that I've been now for several months thinking about and working with this teaching that Report an error in the passage at 8:16

8:41 So I get very excited feeling into this truth, the true aspect of our life that is just starting now. It just started. We just got here. Welcome to this thing. Report an error in the passage at 8:41

8:59 Apparently, we're human beings. There's this planet we're on. Welcome. Nobody was here before to tell you to orient you. You may feel that missed the orientation. Nobody could orient you because we all just arrived together. Report an error in the passage at 8:59

9:19 So I really enjoy that feeling. And it's, what's the word, could be a little bit unhinged or ungrounded. Maybe you can picture somebody telling you, you know, grabbing you by the shoulders and saying, we just got here. And you might not want to get in the car with them, you know, or have them plan an event for you. Report an error in the passage at 9:19

9:53 And yet, it's like, what more true thing could be said than that? What that touches about something that's overlaid with all of this knowing, all of this story about what this being is. And it's all true and it's all good and we're all responsible to it. But what is missing in our usual picture of being? That's why we wear the robes, I think. There's something missing in just this ordinary way where I'm a person and we're all people and we're vertical on this round earth and we're wandering around over time. Report an error in the passage at 9:53

10:27 I arrived on my... That is absolutely the true thing about our life. It's insane to not acknowledge and be responsible to that. And yet, if that's the only kind of mind we know, if that's the only way we're here, we're just missing something so real and true about what this experience of being alive is. Report an error in the passage at 10:27

10:57 So Zen has all these teachings that kind of push us to just remembering, remind us. Yeah, I know, the whole thing, yes, all of it, true. But right now, what is it actually like to be? Report an error in the passage at 10:57

11:13 And how do we forget that? And one of the kinds of things that might come out of touching what it's like to be is, I can't really say when this started. What would that even mean, you know, in this moment of being, to say it came from before or it's going to somewhere later? Report an error in the passage at 11:13

11:41 If we're not grounding in that knowing, what would that even be? Do you know what I mean? Report an error in the passage at 11:41

11:51 So we talk in Buddhism, in Buddha Dharma, there's this teaching of the middle way, that we're always walking the middle way. Report an error in the passage at 11:51

12:00 In my study, I've been feeling more resonance with the view of the round way, the circle, the all-inclusive way, the way that totally includes these both sides of what we are. Report an error in the passage at 12:00

12:16 To not be confused by either. To not be that kind of wide-eyed, you know, we just got here and not able to kind of snap out of it, you know. It's not, I think, where we want to be. Although they seem to be having a fine time. But it's not authentic. It's not totally authentic. I want to try to say something about that. Report an error in the passage at 12:16

12:51 It's not totally authentic to just say, you know, I was born on my birth date and I've been unfolding ever since. And it's not totally authentic to say, This is really wild. We just got here. What's the way that includes all of that? The round way, the whole way, the middle way. Report an error in the passage at 12:51

13:18 So there's a story we have in our tradition, maybe a story familiar to many of you, of a person who was insistent on that Report an error in the passage at 13:18

13:35 there is no past or future and that what this life is, that we just got here. And his name was Hyakujo, and he lived in the distant past, like maybe eons. or at least many centuries before another Hyakujo who lived in the Tang Dynasty in China and was a great ancestor of our way of Zen practice, Hyakujo or Baizhang. Report an error in the passage at 13:35

14:13 So in a long tradition of hapless abbots, this hapless abbot, the old Hyakujo, tried to give a talk on a Sunday and someone asked him some question and he said, Report an error in the passage at 14:13

14:31 We all just got here. And I don't know if it was at that very moment or just a few years later that he turned into a fox and had to stay in the body of a fox for 500 lifetimes. Report an error in the passage at 14:31

14:53 And it seems like not one of the happy foxes. I think about the happy foxes, if you've seen, did you see the one where they're in the snow? You know, and there's the mouse underneath. Report an error in the passage at 14:53

15:06 That. Seems like I'd do that for 500 lifetimes. Report an error in the passage at 15:06

15:13 And then there's like a delicious sandwich under there. Report an error in the passage at 15:13

15:20 But in this tradition, you know, for some reason, you do not want to be a fox. So maybe somebody knew something that I don't know about what it's like to be a fox. Report an error in the passage at 15:20

15:35 So the sense of like, because you were pushing away the actual reality of that you're a person in time and the stuff you do matters. You're an ordinary person in the world and you're responsible to that. Because this teacher was so excited about the present moment that he didn't include that, then he had to be a fox for 500 lifetimes until he kind of got the idea. Report an error in the passage at 15:35

16:01 So he's there as a fox kind of reflecting on, I guess I just arrived here now, but how come I'm a fox? It's like, oh, right, because something carried over from the past. Report an error in the passage at 16:01

16:13 So he started over these lifetimes to grow up, to mature. You know, some people read the story and say he was punished, but it's more like he just needed more training. He needed 500 lifetimes as a fox to really get like, yes, you're just arising now. You were totally right about that. And also, there's something you need to include, which is that you carried over from the past. Or, as Dogen Zenji in his profound maturity puts it, it's not that it was carried over from the past, and it's not that it's arising now. Report an error in the passage at 16:13

16:46 It's not any of those things. You're trying to get a handle on the ungraspable being that includes all of it. So you say, just start it now, or I'm old and tired because it's been going for a long time. Both of those are just trying to get some handle on the thing, the thing that we're doing together that we don't really know what it is because we can't step out of it to know it. Report an error in the passage at 16:46

17:15 So this fox growing up, lifetime after lifetime, the story is vague on how he managed. This, but then he shows up at a dharma talk disguised as a human. So I'm always on the lookout. Report an error in the passage at 17:15

17:35 And he was able to have an exchange with our ancestor, Bai Zhang, or Hyakujo, which is the name of the mountain. So they're all named Hyakujo, which is confusing. Report an error in the passage at 17:35

18:02 So he asks, he has an exchange with Hyakujo where he comes to realize that what he does matters. What he is, is just arising now, and it's carried over from the past. And he's liberated from the fox body. Report an error in the passage at 18:02

18:33 And then the Tang Dynasty, Hyakujo, in a beautiful kind of capping moment of that old story, gathers the assembly and says, we're going to have the funeral for an abbot. And they go up in the mountains and find the body of the fox and hold an abbot's funeral. Report an error in the passage at 18:33

18:58 The fox has been liberated from his idea that either he is just arising or that he's something that exists in time that you could get a handle on. Report an error in the passage at 18:58

19:14 So it's so important, you know, what this old Hyakujo is bringing, that truth of the immediacy of our life, so we can see, you know, either that person who's a little bit unhinged, who's kind of in some altered state, thinking that it's just the present moment. We could dismiss that because it seems kind of immature and we could dismiss Hyakujo for saying there's just the present moment. But there's something so important for us there. Report an error in the passage at 19:14

19:47 What is this actually? Is it more like vertical people on a round big ball? Or is it more like, I don't know. I Report an error in the passage at 19:47

20:09 can't even say if I just got here or if it's coming from the past. So Suzuki Roshi tells this story, as many Zen teachers do. Suzuki Roshi, the founder of this San Francisco Zen Center and Green Gulch Farm, Tosahara Zen Mountain Center. Report an error in the passage at 20:09

20:37 He talks about this story and he says, I was asked by a student to speak about the relationship of one moment to the next moment. Report an error in the passage at 20:37

20:52 There are two ways to answer this question. One answer is that there is no relationship. And the other is that there is a relationship. We could get away with so much. We beg you to hold us accountable. Report an error in the passage at 20:52

21:15 I'm laughing because if I have to say something, I always must say it in two ways. He doesn't want to be a fox. But to just say, you know, oh yeah, I can tell you the relationship of one moment to the next is that, you know, they go one after the other causing each other. Report an error in the passage at 21:15

21:38 It would be selling short the dharma, to put it that way. It would not be helping somebody open to the ungraspable, embodied reality of their aliveness. Report an error in the passage at 21:38

21:52 So yeah, there is no relationship, and there is a relationship between one moment and the next. So is there a relationship between one moment and the next? Report an error in the passage at 21:52

22:05 Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Report an error in the passage at 22:05

22:11 If you stick to some dualistic understanding of yes or no, That will be the wrong answer because reality does not exist in that way. Yes is right and no is right too. Yes is not right and no is also not right. Report an error in the passage at 22:11

22:36 Reality, not reality in some sense other than our life, but the reality of our life doesn't exist in that way that you could say what it is or what it isn't. Report an error in the passage at 22:36

22:48 You can be it fully and it sure seems like we can be it half-heartedly, but Report an error in the passage at 22:48

22:59 it doesn't exist in the way of Yes and no. So we try to appreciate and enter the stillness and openness, the non-grasping of zazen mind, not Report an error in the passage at 22:59

23:20 reaching for any knowing, letting the reality be not yes or no, to fully be this. Report an error in the passage at 23:20

· · · silence, 1 minute

24:15 We're trying to appreciate, and the teachings help us to appreciate, that we're layering a kind of view onto the situation. Report an error in the passage at 24:15

24:29 That might be effective or true in its way, but doesn't really reach. Report an error in the passage at 24:29

24:38 So there's another story that Suzuki Roshi comments on that I want to share briefly and then hear what you all have to say. Report an error in the passage at 24:38

24:54 Another famous story, kind of fundamental story in Zen, of the arrival of Zen in China through the person of Bodhidharma, who met the emperor. Report an error in the passage at 24:54

25:14 So here's how Suzuki Roshi puts this story. Emperor Wu of Liang asked Bodhidharma, what is the first principle? Or what is the absolute truth of our life? Or like, what's really going on here? Report an error in the passage at 25:14

25:29 You seem to know something. And I'm the emperor, so come on. What's going on here? Report an error in the passage at 25:29

25:40 He's been holding it together pretty well, you know, all these years as emperor. He founded a dynasty. But he's like, what is actually going on? Report an error in the passage at 25:40

25:52 And Bodhidharma says, there is no holy or common person. So there's no holy person, there's no common person. Report an error in the passage at 25:52

26:12 That's a way of expressing what's really going on here. It's not divided into like people who get it and people who don't. No holy person, no common person. And the emperor said, well, then who are you in front of me? Report an error in the passage at 26:12

26:31 And Bodhidharma said, I don't know. Report an error in the passage at 26:31

26:40 I think it's easy for me to... To like not appreciate what it would be like to meet the emperor of China. To have that kind of composure and that confidence in your being. Report an error in the passage at 26:40

26:56 Saying, aren't you a great person? Aren't you a holy person? I don't know what I am. I just got here. Report an error in the passage at 26:56

27:07 There's just this aliveness that I'm being together with you and I don't know. And you can't make me know. I'm not going to be intimidated into knowing, saying all the sutras that he knew, you know. Report an error in the passage at 27:07

27:26 And then he went and sat in a cave for nine years, maybe just to, like, recover from that. It's just like, I can't believe what just happened. Report an error in the passage at 27:26

27:37 And to grow the composure, you know, part of why we're so, you know, Zen, of course, is offering some teaching. It's offering some framework. The purpose of the framework is to like try to shine some light on and unhook us from the framework that we already are totally swimming in, which is just this kind of objective, materialistic kind of view of what the world really is. Report an error in the passage at 27:37

28:09 Like I like to do spiritual stuff, but really, you know, when the bills are due, I know what the world actually is, which is that it's, you know, vertical people on a round thing, like stressing each other out. Report an error in the passage at 28:09

28:24 Zen is not trying to say, oh, really, it's the opposite of that. It's trying to say, do you see that that's an idea that's not actually touching your own direct experience in this moment of being that you don't even know when it started or what's inside and what's outside? Report an error in the passage at 28:24

28:43 So we're trying, and it's impossible. So that's why it lasts for thousands of years, this tradition, because we're trying to use some framework to kind of dislodge a framework, to just enter the stillness and reality of the... free of all of our ideas about it, including I have a body, I have a mind, I, you, it. Report an error in the passage at 28:43

29:12 So we're not throwing anything away. We're just trying to find all that space underneath the framework so that we can live with more space and ease but not be stuck in that new one, you know, not be stuck on the thing that's supposed to help get us unstuck. Report an error in the passage at 29:12

29:31 That's the old problem with Zen that's been trying to Talk our way out of it for a long time. He'd say, you know, in this tradition, we don't use words because any words will be confusing and then we go on and on about how we don't do it. Report an error in the passage at 29:31

29:50 So he goes to the cave to sit for nine years facing the wall to just abide in this wonder, in this I don't know. And growing his strength to tolerate that, I think part of why we go back to like, oh, I know what the world is and maybe even it's bad and stressful and small. Report an error in the passage at 29:50

30:10 But at least I know what it is, you know? And as we open and connect with the more ungraspable aliveness and the wonder and this kind of truth that nobody knows what's happening here and we all just got here, that's kind of like a lot, you know, to meet, especially Report an error in the passage at 30:10

30:36 when the emperor is looking right at you. So we grow this kind of strength or composure or great patience. And in the tradition, fundamentally what that patience or composure is for is so that we can actually open to how amazing it is to be alive. We're kind of like recoiling from that a little bit. So then we make the world small and wonder, why am I suffering in this small world? It's like, well, because it's kind of scary to just let go of everything and just plunge into this moment, not knowing what's going to happen or who you are. Report an error in the passage at 30:36

31:13 But you can trust it. Report an error in the passage at 31:13

31:18 So he sat for nine years growing his wonder and growing the composure to allow the wonder to keep growing. They have to grow at the same speed. Report an error in the passage at 31:18

31:29 And that's maybe this kind of wide-eyed person who can't snap out of the oneness. It's like, oh, your composure didn't grow quite as fast as your wonder. So we take care of both. Report an error in the passage at 31:29

31:45 So Suzuki Roshi of this story of Bodhidharma says, Bodhidharma went by saying, I don't know. revealed himself to the emperor as someone without form or name, who was just sitting without thinking, without doing anything, being with everything. That's a really important point for Suzuki Roshi. In this kind of unconstructed being alive, everything's included. Report an error in the passage at 31:45

32:17 That's not like something you're doing by yourself. The aliveness is the whole field of alive. That's what our life really is actually like. Report an error in the passage at 32:17

32:27 It's not separate from the stuff in it. So being with everything, he's just everything and says, I don't know. But the emperor and the fuller stories, versions of the story elaborate how disappointed the emperor is in this answer. So he says, but the emperor wanted to meet someone wise and powerful and learned and very helpful. Report an error in the passage at 32:27

32:54 So this question and answer was not so successful in the story, you know. Bodhidharma goes off and then the emperor later, you know, realizes what a treasure that was that he was offered and tries to send some people to get Bodhidharma back. But they can't find him because he's in a cave. Report an error in the passage at 32:54

33:21 And he's everything. He's the people looking for him. So not going to find him. So the emperor wanted to meet somebody great, but he just got this I don't know. So then Suzuki Roshi says this other phrase that I've been sitting with and working with. Report an error in the passage at 33:21

33:40 We should understand ourselves in two ways, as a particular person and as someone who has no name, no body, and no mind. Report an error in the passage at 33:40

33:57 We should understand ourselves and fully live from this understanding of ourselves in two ways, as a particular person responsible for our life, and as this being, this aliveness that has no form and no name. Report an error in the passage at 33:57

34:17 And so in Zen, we tend to, you know, we chant like every day in a temple. We say no eyes, no ears, no nose, no tongue, no body, no mind, no form, no name. We're really exercising that part. But it's not because we are going to live there, but just because to come into balance, to grow that side of what our life is. Report an error in the passage at 34:17

34:38 Do you know what I mean? Maybe you don't have that problem. Maybe you need to grow that, make your bed side, you know. But for many of us, it's just like, what is this really that doesn't have a name or a body or an inside or an outside? It's just this undivided field of being, not as some special state, but it's just the actual fact of what this is. Report an error in the passage at 34:38

35:02 So to be both of these. And what Report an error in the passage at 35:02

35:09 does that feel like? What does that look like to fully embody both of these sides, to be a particular person and to be this being that includes everything, that has no name and no form? Report an error in the passage at 35:09

35:23 And I thought this morning as I was enjoying breakfast, Zen Report an error in the passage at 35:23

35:35 students are pretty good at making breakfast, even though they don't know who they are or what anything is. Like the bell rings and they go to the kitchen and they don't know who they are or whether it just started. And they don't know what an onion is and they don't know what a hand is, but they reach for the onion and they put it on a board and turns out they know how to chop an onion. Report an error in the passage at 35:35

36:02 Even though they just got here, they're not sure if they just got here because how come they know how to chop an onion? Maybe they didn't just get here. And they chop an onion and then they turn on a stove, even though they don't know what any of that is. And they mash up some tofu and they fry it until it's just right. And then they sit down and they might feel like, I just got here and there's a bowl of tofu scramble for me. Report an error in the passage at 36:02

36:42 Even though somebody looking from outside say, you just made yourself breakfast. To be amazed, you sit down, wow, thanks for making me breakfast, whoever that was. Report an error in the passage at 36:42

36:55 And this practice, you know, when we have the opportunity, what an honor to be able to make breakfast for each other. So we don't know what any of that is. We've managed to make breakfast. We're eating the breakfast and someone comes and says, hey, are there any allergens in the breakfast? And even though you don't know what an onion is and you don't know, Like Bodhidharma, you say, yes, onions, garlic, soy. Do you know what I mean? You can fully live both of these sides. Report an error in the passage at 36:55

37:29 A whole person. You can be a whole person. And then someone can say, that was the best breakfast ever. And you can say, you're so welcome. It was a joy to make a delicious breakfast for you. And then someone else will come up and say, that was a terrible breakfast. And I hate you. Report an error in the passage at 37:29

37:54 And you can say, I'm so sorry. I want to talk about that when the time is right. I'll try to listen and it'll be hard. Report an error in the passage at 37:54

38:14 So this isn't like an abstract teaching. It's about being fully alive as our life is, which is all of that. Not sticking to knowing or not knowing. But now and then to sit in zazen and just taste that unconstructed, timeless, formless. Being alive. Report an error in the passage at 38:14

38:42 I'll continue a little bit more of Suzuki Roshi on this and then close. To understand ourselves in these two ways is liberation from ourselves. In the true understanding of ourselves, there are both viewpoints. That is what we mean when we say things as it is. And that is how we should exist as a human being in this world or else we will be lost. Report an error in the passage at 38:42

39:10 Most of the time, we lead our lives From the one-sided viewpoint of just being a particular person who can be known by others, but then we lose the other side, that we are someone who has no name, no body, and no mind. That is why this world is so busy and noisy, because we've lost that other side, the most obvious side. Report an error in the passage at 39:10

39:41 We're here when we understand our world in the true way, with calmness of mind, understanding both viewpoints. We will have compassion for the people who are involved in just the one-sided view, and Report an error in the passage at 39:41

40:02 of course for ourselves when we're involved in the one-sided view. We should concentrate on this through our everyday near-at-hand practice. Report an error in the passage at 40:02

40:18 And the teaching is so clear, you know, that in doing so, in living in this whole way, that's good ground to be a benefit to each other. So we do this practice to fully enjoy our life, to fully become ourself. And also so that we can really support each other in a true and deep way. So whatever good comes from our practice is always offered to everyone, to all of us laboring under these one-sided views, who we think we are and what we think this is and how we're trying to get out into something better. Report an error in the passage at 40:18

40:59 Just a few more minutes if there's any comment or question, if anybody wants to share a reflection. Report an error in the passage at 40:59

41:21 Thank you. It feels so good to be here. Today happens to be a little bit higher. Thank you so much. Today happens to be my birthday. And so when you say that I just arrived here and it's all unfolding and both are true, it is such a relief to hear that. And I feel so safe in this room with these people and these walls. And then I have to go back into the world. Report an error in the passage at 41:21

41:50 world and I have to go to work and know things and I don't get to say I don't know I just got here and I have to make good decisions in my relationship and with finance and every day and that's so hard and I get I want you answered it in the last hour and I get that I'm using this Report an error in the passage at 41:50

42:21 40 hours, 80 hours, 100 hours a week. How do I bring this framework into that framework and not just unlock it? Help. Thank you for giving us such a wonderful gift on your birthday. Report an error in the passage at 42:21

43:03 Are you sure that you have to know what you're doing? Oh no. Yeah. So you could just try in little ways. You don't have to just like go to work. I think you can go to work and not know. because you know what you need to know. Report an error in the passage at 43:03

43:27 It's kind of like the cook making breakfast. your being can be grounded in that, in the more open, immediate. And then your knowing and your responsibility and your interrelatedness, that all is kind of held by that. So Report an error in the passage at 43:27

43:54 I... I often suggest just trying in little ways, you know, like, I don't know if you drove here, but you maybe will have to walk to your car, someone's car at some point later today. And you could try doing that without being so sure where you're going or why. And I'm pretty sure you're going to end up at your car. It's like... Report an error in the passage at 43:54

44:22 To trust, to let go in little ways and just see, or like making breakfast is a good example. Like, can you go, you know, can you pour the cereal and pour the milk without like as much knowing, you know? And we try that out in little ways and see, that actually went fine. The milk made it into the cereal bowl, even though I wasn't like grounding in the knowing. Report an error in the passage at 44:22

44:47 It was letting the knowing unfold, so there's no blocking of that, but just that grounding in my body, in my breath. It's so important what you're saying and this distinction, this division of like, there's a place where I can be free of that and then there's a place where I have to be caught up in that. Report an error in the passage at 44:47

45:05 That's exactly what the tradition is trying to help us to soften. Report an error in the passage at 45:05

45:21 I don't know if that's helpful, but thank you for sharing what we all feel, which is how can we live this out and to let it take a long time. And when we do have the chance to steep in the formless, it's pretty good too. to just let that kind of wisdom of that come into our bones a little more so then it's not even like a separate kind of special effort but just more like what it is for us being alive you Thank you. Made my bones feel better. And I'm so touched that you feel safe here, and may we be worthy of that trust, and may all beings be safe. Report an error in the passage at 45:21

46:16 Is there another comment or question? Report an error in the passage at 46:16

46:22 story originally was about... Here's a microphone that might help, especially for the people online. Oh, sorry. I was wondering whether the story in the Tang Dynasty originated because of the aliveness of the fox spirit amongst the people who worked in the fields. And you had started off with a meerkat, and here was the fox. And the meerkat and the fox are beings. Yep. Report an error in the passage at 46:22

46:52 They're it, yeah. That's all I wanted to comment. Thank you. Report an error in the passage at 46:52

47:03 It was you, I see. Report an error in the passage at 47:03

47:13 Zen delights in these kinds of stories. You know, they set up kind of the good and the bad, and then all the Zen teachers get to play with that and say, oh, the thing you thought was bad was actually the good, and the thing you thought was good was the bad. Report an error in the passage at 47:13

47:25 Let's all just be foxes and go play in the sun. Maybe that's enough for today, unless there's another... Okay, yeah, sure, something in the... We can cut through. There's one in the back there on the side, Tom. Report an error in the passage at 47:25

47:54 Thank you for your talk. I was wondering, it's more of a comment, but I was wondering if you could speak to the interdependence of both sides of that. Report an error in the passage at 47:54

48:08 Can you share more about where you're coming from or what you're appreciating in that? Yeah, just the idea of just being versus being in time and space. And just the interdependence of the two. Yes. The... Report an error in the passage at 48:08

48:28 There's another teaching from Suzuki Roshi that I thought I might share, which is exactly that, that like the sound of the bird doesn't interrupt our zazen. The sound of the bird calls us deeper into zazen. The thing that's coming up is helping us. So one way that Suzuki Roshi talks about and that I've also been appreciating is like the background and the foreground. Report an error in the passage at 48:28

48:51 So he says that kind of unconstructed or big mind. It's like the background that things are arising in. So of course they're interdependent. You can't have the background without the foreground. They're not separate. They're not even separate things. Or the water and the waves. It's the same substance. It's not even interdependent maybe, but like the different views of the same being. Report an error in the passage at 48:51

49:20 And appreciating that is so important to appreciate that so that we don't then get confused of like, where's the one? Where's the other? Oh, I've lost the one. I have to scramble back to it. We're trying to scramble back to the oneness, which is the whole point of that was to not have to scramble to anything, you know. And that's the big problem with Zen is that it sets up this thing that we're going to try to get back to, you know, next Sunday or next year or whenever we can do the meditation retreat, rather than the call to our life as it is, moment after moment, right in the complexity, to be this person in the complexity, in the tangle. Report an error in the passage at 49:20

50:02 Thank Report an error in the passage at 50:02

50:06 you so much for your kindness today. Thank you for listening to this podcast offered by the San Francisco Zen Center. Our programs are made possible by the donations we receive. Please help us to continue to realize and actualize the practice of giving by offering your financial support. being. Report an error in the passage at 50:06

· · · silence, 1 minute

50:35 For more information, visit sfzc.org and click Giving. May we fully enjoy the Dharma. Report an error in the passage at 50:35

Report an error

Passage at . Please listen to the audio before you suggest a fix.

Suggest a fix

Passage at . Please listen to the audio before you suggest a fix.

Related talks

  1. Opinions and “The Way”

    Jiryu Rutschman-Byler · 7 December 2025 · 54 min

  2. Kindness and Oneness

    Jiryu Rutschman-Byler · 23 August 2026 · 51 min

  3. Left Hand, Right Hand

    Jiryu Rutschman-Byler · 1 March 2026 · 43 min

  4. To Shine One Corner

    Jiryu Rutschman-Byler · 5 July 2026 · 58 min

  5. Freedom in Limitation

    Jiryu Rutschman-Byler · 19 October 2025 · 39 min

  6. In the Lap of the Buddha

    Jiryu Rutschman-Byler · 10 May 2026 · 53 min

Talk by Jiryu Rutschman-Byler, recorded 13 September 2026. Original at San Francisco Zen Center: https://sfzc.engagewisdom.com/talks/i-don’t-know-and-i-know. Licensed No license stated; shared with the archive's knowledge (courtesy note). Transcript generated automatically and may contain errors; the audio is the authoritative version.

Listen on San Francisco Zen Center · No license stated; shared with the archive's knowledge (courtesy note)